Microplastics are everywhere: in our water, air, food, and even our bodies. But how worried should we be?

This week’s Wednesday Weigh-In asked: “What’s your biggest concern about microplastics in food?” With over 150 responses, your feedback shows unease over health risks, regulatory gaps, and unknowns.

Let’s unpack the results, dive into the science, and explore how microplastics infiltrate our food and bodies.

Poll Results: Your Concerns

• 🩺 Health risks – Potential links to diseases like cancer, heart issues, or hormonal disruption: 42%

• ❓ Health unknowns – Uncertainty about long-term effects on the body: 37%

• ⚖️ Lack of regulation – Not enough rules to limit microplastics in food: 15%

• 😌 Not worried – I don’t think microplastics are a big issue: 6%

What Are Microplastics and How Do They Get Into Our Food and Bodies?

Microplastics are plastic particles smaller than 5 mm, often breaking down into nanoplastics (<1 μm). They come in forms like fibers, granules, or films, originating from:

• Primary sources: Intentionally small plastics, like microbeads in cosmetics or resin pellets for manufacturing.

• Secondary sources: Larger plastics (e.g., bottles, bags) degraded by UV radiation, weathering, or mechanical action into tiny fragments.

How They Enter Food: Microplastics pollute ecosystems, from oceans to farmland. Seafood absorbs microplastics from water. Crops take up particles from contaminated soil or water, altered by plastic’s impact on soil fertility. Food packaging and processing equipment also shed microplastics, though the FDA has found no evidence of significant migration from packaging.

How They Enter Bodies: Humans ingest microplastics through food (seafood, water, salt), inhale them from air (e.g., synthetic textile fibers), or absorb them via skin from personal care products.

Once inside, particles can cross biological barriers like the gut or placenta, accumulating in organs. A 2022 study detected microplastics in ~77% of human blood samples, confirming systemic circulation.

🩺 Health Risks: The Top Concern (42%)

Nearly half of you flagged health risks as the primary concern, citing potential links to cancer, heart issues, and hormonal disruption.

“Health risks to humans and other creatures are a huge concern,” wrote one reader, also noting nanoplastic interference with plant photosynthesis, which could threaten food security. Another highlighted early puberty in girls, linking it to hormone disruption.

Science Check: A 2024 study in Toxicological Sciences found microplastics in every human testicle sampled (23 men, ages 16–88), with polyethylene and PVC as the most common types. Higher PVC levels in dog testes correlated with lower sperm counts, suggesting a possible link to male fertility decline. Microplastics have also been detected in human blood, placentas, breast milk, and thrombi, indicating widespread bodily contamination. These particles can cause inflammation, oxidative stress, and endocrine disruption, with additives like BPA and phthalates mimicking hormones and altering reproductive and thyroid functions. Animal studies show reduced sperm quality, ovarian fibrosis, and developmental abnormalities, but human data remains limited. The World Health Organization (WHO) calls for more research but acknowledges risks from chemical additives.

❓ Health Unknowns: Uncertainty Looms (37%)

Thirty-seven percent of you worried about long-term effects, reflecting unease about what we don’t yet know.

“It’s going to be difficult to get rid of plastics,” one reader wrote, pointing to fleece fabrics, which shed microfibers during washing and wear. Another questioned resource allocation: “Are there enough resources to oversee so many health risks?”

Science Check: A 2024 review in Science of the Total Environment found microplastics in human feces, blood, and organs, acting as carriers for pathogens and pollutants like heavy metals. Smaller particles (<10 μm) can cross biological barriers, accumulating in the liver, brain, and testes, potentially disrupting the hypothalamic-pituitary axes. While short-term toxicity includes inflammation and oxidative stress, long-term human health outcomes are unclear. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is funding studies on chronic exposure, particularly its effects on the gut, immune system, and endocrine glands.

⚖️ Lack of Regulation: A Systemic Issue (15%)

Fifteen percent of respondents called out insufficient rules. “Lack of regulation and enforcement is closely intertwined with health risks,” one wrote, citing industry’s poor self-regulation. Another expressed despair: “We are surrounded by plastic; it certainly seems too late.”

Science Check: The FDA has no specific microplastics regulations for food, though it monitors contaminants under general safety laws. The European Union leads with bans on single-use plastics and microplastic limits in cosmetics. A 2024 Nature article criticized global regulatory gaps, noting untested microplastics in food packaging. The EPA is exploring water filtration standards, but food safety lags. The FDA emphasizes that current microplastic levels in food don’t violate regulations unless proven harmful, but critics argue this overlooks cumulative risks.

😌 Not Worried: A Minority View (6%)

Six percent of respondents dismissed microplastics as a non-issue. “I don’t think microplastics are a big issue,” one wrote, aligning with skepticism about overhyped risks.

Science Check: A 2022 FAO report estimated humans ingest 0.1–5 grams of microplastics weekly, mostly from water and seafood, but deemed risks “low” based on current data. However, a 2023 Frontiers in Endocrinology review warned that microplastics’ endocrine-disrupting chemicals (e.g., PBDEs, phthalates) could bioaccumulate, affecting thyroid, reproductive, and adrenal functions. Critics argue low-dose, chronic exposure may have understated cumulative effects.

Interesting Fact

Table salt, a daily staple, is a surprising source of microplastics. A 2024 study by Toxics Link found microplastics in all tested Indian salt brands, with iodized salt containing up to 89.15 particles per kg, primarily polyethylene and polypropylene fragments. Given India’s role as a major salt exporter, this suggests even small daily salt intake (e.g., 5 g) could contribute hundreds of microplastic particles annually to diets worldwide, highlighting the need for better filtration during production.

Why It Matters

The science backs your unease—microplastics are pervasive, with emerging evidence of health impacts like endocrine disruption and fertility issues, yet regulatory frameworks lag. As one reader put it, “Everything is in plastic, so what is safe?” Balancing innovation, cost, and safety remains a challenge.

What’s your take?

(Keep it respectful; personal attacks or ads will be removed.)

Stay tuned for next Wednesday’s Weigh-In! Until then, stay safe and informed with FSN Daily!

All the best,
Jonan Pilet, Newsletter Editor

Weekend Poll

Past Week’s Recalls

U.S.-Based Recalls:

• Martinelli’s recalls apple juice because of potential patulin contamination

• JJ Nuts recalls sunflower kernels because of glass contamination

• Pacific Meridian recalls garlic powder because of metal contamination

• Request Foods recalls soups because of wood contamination

• Texas Olive Company recalls Capers, Giardiniera, and Pepperoncini because of improper sealing

• Golden Crop Candy recalled because of undeclared and unallowed colors

• USDA issues public warning about pork carnitas sold at Aldi stores nationwide

• Company recalls soybean paste because of undeclared wheat

Canada-Based Recalls:

• Fairway Market croissants recalled in Canada because of undeclared egg

• Canadian company recalls frozen pastries because of Salmonella illness

• More recalls…

Don’t forget…

Do you know someone who would like this newsletter? Share it with them.

Interested in reaching food safety-conscious readers like you? To become a Food Safety News partner, apply here.